thats "fluif" on this list, Gary! LOL =
And as far as the synthetic goes, as long as you have none of the old flu=
id in the lines, then by all means go w/Dot 5. It's a funky shade of purpl=
e, but it works very well w/no deterioration of the m/c rubber as is the ca=
se w/dot 3. I've used in my '71 TR6 for a long time w/much success. Good l=
uck!
--- On Wed, 3/30/11, Gary Nafziger <nafzigerg@yahoo.com> wrote:
> From: Gary Nafziger <nafzigerg@yahoo.com>
> Subject: [TR] silicon or regular brake fluic
> To: triumphs@autox.team.net
> Date: Wednesday, March 30, 2011, 8:59 PM
> I'll have a completely new brake
> system when I'm finally finished with the =
> restoration.=A0 Are silicon people happy with that
> choice?=A0 I've heard drawbacks =
> of it being thinner, making leaks more likely.
> =
> I'd love the idea of it not harming paint though.=A0 =
> =
> Just wondering
> =
> gary n.
> _______________________________________________
> Triumphs@autox.team.net
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Suggested annual donation=A0 $11.47
> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> Manage your account: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/triumphs/parad=
ise.712002@yahoo.com
> =
> =
_______________________________________________
Triumphs@autox.team.net
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Suggested annual donation $11.47
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
Manage your account: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/triumphs/mharc@a=
utox.team.net
|