triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Twinkies (was Dot 5 vs. Dot 4 or 5.1)

To: <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Subject: RE: Twinkies (was Dot 5 vs. Dot 4 or 5.1)
From: "Randall Young" <Ryoung@navcomtech.com>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 06:49:10 -0700
> You seem to know the chemical stuff-

Dad was always disappointed that I didn't follow him into being a PhD
chemist ...

> What's the filling in a "Twinkie"? Or
> is it made from chemicals not found on this planet naturally?...

You don't really want to know!  However, if you insist, check out these
links :
http://www.users.voicenet.com/~steinfor/twinkie.htm
http://www.twinkiesproject.com/
and definitely not least
http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/West/09/18/offbeat.twinkie.reut/

Randall

///  triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list
///  or try  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • RE: Twinkies (was Dot 5 vs. Dot 4 or 5.1), Randall Young <=