| To: | Bob Danielson <75trsix@snet.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Haynes vs. Bentley |
| From: | "Martin A. Secrest" <msecrest@erols.com> |
| Date: | Sun, 13 Feb 2000 11:03:09 -0500 |
| Cc: | Triumph <triumphs@autox.team.net> |
| References: | <LPBBIJIFJOGKGDBLMLNNIEAKCGAA.75trsix@snet.net> |
I'm probably in the minority, but I prefer the Haynes manual. It's laid out much more logically than the Bentley. You always have to dig for a while in the Bentley to find what you need, which is not the way I like to spend my wrench time. Of course, it's best to have them both. -- Martin Secrest TR6, GT6 Bob Danielson wrote: > For a TR6 which of the two is the better manual to have: Haynes or Bentley. > I'm thinking in reference to completeness, ease of understanding, accuracy > etc. > TIA > Bob Danielson > 75 TR6 - status at > http://pages.cthome.net/BobD |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Seeking Wisdom on expensive purchases!, Martin A. Secrest |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | A-Type Overdrive Electricals, Michael Ferguson |
| Previous by Thread: | Haynes vs. Bentley, Bob Danielson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Haynes vs. Bentley, Scoti |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |