| To: | arthurhsmith@compuserve.com, triumphs@autox.team.net, spitfires@autox.team.net |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: SQUAT |
| From: | Day.John@fin.gc.ca |
| Date: | Fri, 18 Jun 1999 13:59:17 -0400 |
Arthur - I think that helps explain the IRS 'squat' - the pavement around
the rear tires of a TR6 and ancestors (4A/250) must actually be lower than
the surrounding pavement when you hit the throttle!
And here I was all this time thinking it was just a sh***y suspension!
Thanks! JD
-----Original Message-----
From: Arthur H. Smith [SMTP:arthurhsmith@compuserve.com]
Sent: June 18, 1999 1:52 PM
To: triumphs; SPITFIRES
Subject: SQUAT
Last night I watched a program about the investigation into when
the QE ll
ran aground off Marthas Vineyard. The Captain and pilot both
followed
proper procedure and the only thing left was the charts showing the
depth
at 39 feet. The QE ll has a draft of 32 feet so there should have
been
adequate clearance. At first it was thought the charts could be
wrong so
NOAA redid the depth sounding and found a few spots a little less
than 39
feet in depth.
The final finding was, as a ship moves through the water the force
of the
water moving under the ship creates a hole around the ship in the
water and
the ship actual sinks. While the water level along the water line
stays the
same the depression at the water line is closer to the bottom. This
phenomenon is called "squat," so as a ship moves it squats down in
the
water. The full extent of the effect was not totally understood so
at 25
knots the QE ll sank 8 feet and the 7 feet of clearance disappeared.
Hence
it ran aground in water that was 39 feet deep.
It ended with the announcer saying that after 20 years experience
the
captain of the QE ll didn't know "squat."
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|