triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

TR250/6 Grose Jet/Modification

To: triumphs@Autox.Team.Net
Subject: TR250/6 Grose Jet/Modification
From: highwaystar@juno.com (Highway Star)
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1998 14:00:36 EST
Cc: b.johnson@diamond.co.uk, tboicey@brit.ca, vafred@erols.com, mdporter@rt66.com, drjclark@mindspring.com
References: <19981104.011349.5303.0.HighwayStar@juno.com>
Fred/Brian/Trevor/Michael/Jack and all-

Grose Jets: Thanks for the replies to whether use Grose Jets or not.  The
consensus is to use them.  But some reservation as far as vibrations
causing the ball to act erratically.  This will be the second time that
I've taken sound advise from the list.  And I'm considering all inputs: 
Plan of action is to replace with Grose Jets, and keep the original
needle valve (freaking expensive-$22.00 each) if things fall apart and
replace with original if necessary.

TR250/5 Modifications: Don't know about the rest of the US but California
passed No-smog required emission for 1968 cars in 1998, which includes
the TR250.  Up to this time no modifications (webers etc. for increased
HP) would've been permitted to make it street legal.   I'm not quit sure
about the comment of Weber carbs being concourse status!!!...more
clarification please...doesn't make sense.

Thanks very much...off I go.

Pouya
'74 TR6 Carmine Red     "DAMMED"
'68 TR250 BRG           "ZOSO NO1"


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>