triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Crane versus Ignitor

To: <jbonina@nectech.com>, <triumphs@Autox.Team.Net>
Subject: Re: Crane versus Ignitor
From: "Kevin N. Andrews" <kevina@emji.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 1998 17:37:04 -0500
I have put an ignitor in my 250 just last year. I can notice a differance
in the way the car runs. But the biggest differance is after the car sat
for two months that it fired right up. When I just had the points in the
car, it wouldn't start right off the bat.
But with the ignitor it fires up quick. It was also a sinch to put in.
Kevin Andrews
Siler City,NC
250's (CD2908LO)
        (CD7766L)

----------
> From: jbonina@nectech.com
> To: triumphs@autox.team.net
> Subject: Crane versus Ignitor
> Date: Friday, March 20, 1998 11:10 AM
> 
> 
>      Listers, 
>      
>      I apologize if this was already hashed over, I haven't been on the 
>      list all that long and I don't seem to remember seeing any specific 
>      discussion on the topic.
>      
>      Are there any real differences between after-market electronic 
>      ignitions? Specifically I'm talking about the Crane XR700 and
Ignitor.
>      
>      I've recently gotten *many* positive responses from users of the
Crane 
>      system. But, I've also received responses from others who criticize 
>      the Crane for 20 year old technology, external boxes, etc..
>      
>      Is there anyone out there who can speak for the Ignitor? Better yet,

>      is there anyone who has used both? Am I asking for too much?
>      
>      
>      Thanks folks,
>      
>      Jeff
>      '73 TR6

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>