triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

FW: Re[2]: MGB vs. Spitfire!!

To: "'triumphs@autox.team.net'" <triumphs@Autox.Team.Net>
Subject: FW: Re[2]: MGB vs. Spitfire!!
From: Gernot Vonhoegen <gernot.vonhoegen@stir.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 14:47:23 -0000


> ----------
> From:         Gernot Vonhoegen
> Sent:         Thursday, March 05, 1998 2:46 PM
> To:   'Ross Vincenti'
> Subject:      RE: Re[2]: MGB vs. Spitfire!!
> 
> ====================
> Both are good choices for a first time "wrench head".  You won't go 
> wrong either way.  Some of the list members may disagree about the
> MGB, 
> but chalk that up to bias.  Don't forget to consider the
> sprite/midget, 
> Agree. If funds allow, why not take a look at the TR6
> ====================
>   Parts availibility (specifically panels)
> Equal, all parts available for the B as well.
> , ease of
> > repair (I'm sure that's where the Spit excels!), 
> and overall comparison 
> > of the two (build quality, fit/finish, reliability, fun factor, etc)
> ====================
> Parts for both cars are VERY obtainable and are remarkably cheap
> compared 
> to some other cars such as older Porsche 356s, the big Healy's, or 
> Jaguars for example.  Of course, there are exceptions to the rule - I 
> think you will find that a small handful of parts (e.g., heater
> valves, 
> rear hubs, original fuel pump, etc.) for the Spitfire are either 
> difficult to find here state-side or are available but at what seem to
> be 
> hideous prices.  However, these really are the exception.
> 
> Ease of repair - no contest here, the Spit wins hands down. There is 
> nothing that beats a flip forward bonnet for ease of access.  I don't 
> know if the MGB body easily unbolts from its frame (fellow listers?
> What frame? that much for the advanced technology of the spitfire that
> a fellow lister stressed...
>  
> but the Spit body litterally lifts off after undoing about 10 
> bolts.  Otherwise, there's not a terrible lot of difference between
> the 
> two.
> 
> Overall comparison -  Build quality is the same - spotty in places,
> good 
> in others.  Fit and finish on a project car is really a non-issue if
> you 
> think about it.  You're going to redo it anyways, right?  Keep in mind
> 
> both the MGB and the Spit were meant to be CHEAP sports cars.  A
> better 
> comparison is the sprite/midget, as the MGB is really a more up market
> 
> vehicle as it was slightly better equiped than the Spit and
> significantly 
> heavier.  Reliability was never a strong point with these cars, but if
> 
> you do a full restoration that won't be an issue for you.  Fun factor?
> 
> Shoot, ANY little British car is FUN!
> 
> Final words - find a solid rust free vehicle that is "complete" and 
> within your budget.  If you have to spend a little bit more for a 
> complete car, then go over budget to get it.  You'll be happy you did.
> Agree
> Gernot
> 
> 
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>