Hi Larry,
In a message dated 13/01/98 00:05:49, you write:
<< got the same message earlier, same guy, guess he hasn't checked his
e-mail for a while.
----Original Message Follows----
From: GuyotLeonF <GuyotLeonF@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 1998 18:37:14 EST
To: triumphs@autox.team.net, curry@wolfenet.com, amace@unix2.nysed.gov
Subject: Joe Curry's mailbox
Reply-To: GuyotLeonF <GuyotLeonF@aol.com>
OK I apologise unreservedly to Joe,
I accused him of having a full mailbox,because I got a message telling
me so.
But it must have been a cyber-fib because you replied to my mailing!!!
So who has the full mailbox?
Well,I sent that particular mailing-the one about the odd Triumph colour
names
to the Triumph list,and to Andy Mace.
So if it is true about one of those three being full,then it must be the
list,which I doubt,or Andy's which I also doubt.
I don't get it.,what is the point of the message? reproduced here for my
fellow listers curiosity,any ideas anyone?
*****************************************************************************
*
********************
To: Internet@Services@WHQ[<curry@wolfenet.com>]
Internet@Services@WHQ[<triumphs@autox.team.net>]
Internet@Services@WHQ[<amace@unix2.nysed.gov>]
Cc:
Subject: Re: Triumph World # 18
Message not delivered to recipients below. Press F1 for help with VNM
error codes.
>>>>>>>>>>VNM3043: Dave Gauthier@NetDataMgmt@USRIT<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
It looks like the above named lister is the one at fault!
Not poor ole' maligned Joe!
Seems that when you send a mailing to the list,it goes to all of the 'full
list' receipients as well as the 'digest list' receipients and if any of them
have a full mailbox,then it bounces back to the sender,whether he is a full
lister or a 'digestive' ! Now it begins to make sense.duh...Must be time for
my bed,12.30am.
Best Wishes
Leon
|