triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TR-6 REAR BEARINGS

To: Berry Kercheval <kerch@parc.xerox.com>
Subject: Re: TR-6 REAR BEARINGS
From: Zink <zink@pdq.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 03:50:39 -0500
Cc: s7101 <s7101@jane.penn.com>, triumphs@Autox.Team.Net
References: <97Jun17.110037pdt."304514"@reynaldo.parc.xerox.com>
Berry Kercheval wrote:
> 
> >>>s7101 said:
>  > RECENTLY HAD RIGHT REAR BEARING REPLACED.  MECHANIC COULD NOT GET
> THE
>  > ASSEMBLY APART THEREFORE USED A TORCH. HE THEN ORDERED THE PARTS
> THAT
>  > WERE DISTROYED.  COST TO ME $759.00 OUCH!! WISH THIS CONVERSATION
> WOULD
>  > HAVE OCCCURRED LAST WEEK.  STEVE VOLPE --1976 TR-6
> 
> Steve, please stop shouting.  When you say he used a torch, do you
> mean he
> heated it to try to get it apart, or he used a cutting torch (AKA
> flame
> wrench) on it?
> 
> This leads me to in interesting question: are mechanics liable if they
> ignorantly destroy part of your car and then try to stick you with the
> bill?
> A competent TR-6 mechanic would know what to do with a rear hub; if
> someone
> ruined mine I'd be mad as hell and probably take them to court if they
> didn't
> make it good.  Seems to me that Steve should pay for his new bearings,
> and the
> flat rate book time to install them, and no more.
> 
>   --berry
> 
> Berry Kercheval :: kerch@parc.xerox.com :: Xerox Palo Alto Research
> Center
Good point Berry, A qualified and honest mechanic will not charge for
his mistakes.  But a sleazball will.  Steve ought to have this guys work
checked over by some one else to see if was done properly. JMO

Larry Zink
1964 Spitfire4

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>