triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: High Compression Pistons

To: Triumph list <triumphs@Autox.Team.Net>
Subject: RE: High Compression Pistons
From: Tomislav Marincic <74137.3420@CompuServe.COM>
Date: 14 Mar 97 09:08:14 EST
        Chris,

        Although you addressed your note to "fellow Spitfire owners", I had some
experience with the 1500cc Spit engine in my 1976 Midget...

        I ran a head shaved a full 100 mils with the earlier 9:1 flat-top
pistons. Compression was probably in the neighborhood of 11:1, judging from the
compression test (I never cc'd the head). I ran a stock UK-spec cam (non-smog)
because I just wanted a torquey, flexible engine and didn't really care about
maximizing top end. For this reason, I stuck with the US-spec single valve
springs (a mistake, in retrospect). I had the twin SU's pulled off an earlier
Spit, fitted with richer needles. I ran a glass-pack exhaust.

        The engine ran very sweetly, and sounded just _wonderful_. There was no
valve/piston interference, but I stress that I built the engine for mid-range
performance, and I never exceeded 5000 RPM. If you're running one of the wilder
cams Kent offers, you would want to procede with caution, certainly using the
UK-spec dual valve springs.

        BTW, I wouldn't endorse shaving that much metal off this head. The shape
of the combustion chambers was scary, and though I ground some of the sharpest
edges down to avoid heating them up like glow plugs, I never managed to cure the
car's tendency to Diesel after switching off the ignition. There was no
detonation or ping, however, even at high load/low RPM. I backed off the
ignition advance slightly, and obviously only used 93 octane fuel. Also,
clearance for twin SU's on a Spit manifold in a Midget requires creative
reshaping of the inner fender.

        Hope that helps.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • RE: High Compression Pistons, Tomislav Marincic <=