spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

[Spridgets] Fwd: [Mgs] Spring washers don't work !

Subject: [Spridgets] Fwd: [Mgs] Spring washers don't work !
From: pondhopautomation at gmail.com (Duncan Sinclair)
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:13:25 -0500
References: <4E02192B.4010404@wi.net> <BANLkTi=1QyuyC21Mh39BS5fABYVWqxfqUw@mail.gmail.com>
The Nordlock washers shown here are pretty much industry standard in the oil
industry. They work excellent.
Different principle from a spring washer but very simple.
They are the only type approved for secondary retention on overhead loads
offshore.

Thanks
Duncan


-----Original Message-----
From: spridgets-bounces at autox.team.net
[mailto:spridgets-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of derf
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 3:04 PM
To: Woerpel
Cc: SPRIDGETS
Subject: Re: [Spridgets] Fwd: [Mgs] Spring washers don't work !

OK, here's a pic of a "Junker Test" setup.  It holds the bolt head
stationary and only moves 1/2 of the bolted joint.
In situations similar to that in the real world (like on a Spridget) I think
we use Castellated nuts.

I can't think of a real world situation that is similar to the "Junker
Test".  Does anyone know of one?
I wonder how the "Junker Test" does with chemical bonds (Loctite), and other
forms of mechanical lock washers, besides the ones the video producers are
trying to sell.

http://mdmetric.com/nordlock/Nord-Lock%20-%20Junker%20test%20principle.htm
Suggested annual donation  $12.75
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
Unsubscribe/Manage:
http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/spridgets/pondhopautomation at gmail.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>