I would think it is because after the first year there were a lot of
complaints with a non opening boot.
Lin
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Kirk Hargreaves <khargreaves2@gmail.com>wrote:
> Why would it be a '59 if it was a prototype I wonder?
>
> Would not such a car be an early 58 or prior to 58?
>
> Interesting listing though. . thanks for sending. ..
>
> Kirk
_______________________________________________
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Suggested annual donation $12.75
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
|