One clarification. My proposal did not mention voting on anything.
It merely would be a tool to help make a decision and the first line
of the application(name of area coordinator) would weigh heavily.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Bill L <pythias@pacifier.com> wrote:
> Hello David,
>
> You've nailed the problem perfectly. I saw this problem happen
> when we voted to change the UNION meeting time from 8:00 to 5:00.
> I've heard more gripes since from those who can't make the 5:00
> meeting that they would go if it were moved back a couple of
> hours, but since they can't get to the meeting, and those who DO
> do got the 5:00 want it to stay there, it never gets moved back
> to the time of the greater participation. ...
>
> No matter WHERE the meeting is held it will skew the results in
> favor of meeting nearest to where the vote is held.
>
> The problem with Trevor's solution, is that it presumes that we
> are organized enough to actually hold a vote on ANYTHING.
>
> He is right in wanting the person suggesting a venue to be the one
> charge of that venue. It'll keep the riff raff from just popping
> off and insure that only venues that HAVE and organizer will be
> suggested...
>
> There are NO ideal solutions... the country is just too big.
> Somebody just has to pick one and go with it......and live with
> the results....We can't all be happy all the time, and life isn't
> always fair.
>
> my 2 cents.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Bill L. mailto:pythias@pacifier.com
>
> '66 Sprite MKIII HAN8L49403 "the red thing"
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
http://www.team.net/archive
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/spridgets
|