Brad says, "Alaska doesn't have the same amount of greedy governmental
assholes that CT has.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Billy Zoom <billyzoom@billyzoom.com> wrote:
> So oil in the ground in Connecticut must be removed, but oil in the
> ground in Alaska must not be removed? "
Brad: Haven't you heard about Alaska's senator's & governor's bid for "a
bridge to Nowhere." And, their senator's quest to get the rest of us
taxpayers to fund construction of a new oil/gas pipeline that runs through
Alaska -- parallel to an existing one that runs through Canada?
Granted we're going to need gasoline to run our LBCs for many more years.
BUT, how greedy can you be? The Canadian pipeline exists & if it were used
would require but a fraction of the cost to run additional pipeline to meet
it. But, the Alaskan politicians wouldn't be able to get as much graft from
the contractors, nor would they personally be able to buy as much land on
which it would be built so they could profit from that too by selling or
leasing it to the state.
Norm Sippel
'59 Turner uses race gas only
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
http://www.team.net/archive
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/spridgets
|