| To: | Dan Gillitzer <dang@ticon.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Tach reduction gear |
| Date: | Sat, 11 Feb 2006 09:16:33 -0800 |
| Cc: | "Woerpel's" <dwoerpel@wi.net>, spridgets@autox.team.net |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=R2Ume5yOtxU/Iq2NIV7LAKubDBNHdnxrss47hvOaIQFfi2cGdlQMpk7XRq2DrFUR; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; |
| References: | <000c01c62ef4$a09a4300$3387b542@computer> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) |
Dan Gillitzer wrote: >...and of course the Mk2A had the electric tach. > But the parts book shows it had a mechanical tach reduction gear, and a brass nut at that. Personally, I think Donald Healey was jerking us around. Buster Evans |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: What's wrong with this??, Unknown |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: No LBC - Pics of CA Fires and Willie Nelson, Unknown |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Tach reduction gear, Unknown |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Tach reduction gear, Unknown |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |