Jim,
I am writing about your use of Netscape Mail. Do you use their mail
service or do you use Netscape to handle another ISP email account? The
reason I ask is because I use Netscape to handle my netcom email and any
messages I try to send to the autox servers bounce back to me. This has
been going on for about 10 days.
I'll copy the list on this and i'm sure you won't see it appear.
--
jay fishbein
wallingford, ct
http://home.ix.netcom.com/~type79/
Jim Johnson wrote:
>Eudora is a great solution and it is free from Qualcomm <www.Eudora.com>
>
>I have 5 email engines running:
>1) Netscape Mail: Good system and easy to use... Fairly good spam
>filtering and hackers generally leave it alone.
>2) Eudora 6.0: Great system and easy to use... Great spam filtering
>and hackers generally leave it alone.
>3) Outlook Express: So-so system fairly easy to use... Lousy spam
>filtering and hackers beat it like a $2 mule.
>4) Google's "Gmail": Great system and fairly easy to use... Great
>spam filtering and no sign of hacking- Also gives me 2.2 Gigabytes of
>message storage so I don't have to throw anything away.
>5) Yahoo mail: Fairly good system and easy to use.... Fair spam
>filtering and no sign of hacking - not enough message storage but they
>are due to upgrade very soon.
>
>For a home computer email program I recommend Eudora to everyone. For
>online email system you can't beat "Gmail"
>
>Cheers!!
>Jim - reading email in Dodge City
>
>On 6/28/05, Dave Yealy <lbc@littlebitcountry.com> wrote:
>
>
>>I've been using Eudora ( http://www.eudora.com/ ) for years and it has a
>>spam filter built into it now. It takes a few days, weeks, depending how
>>many messages you get every day, to learn the difference between good and
>>bad. Eliminates a lot of the trash (JUNK) and it's easy to configure once
>>you RTFM. Outlook Express was designed by Microsoft so it's a given that
>>it doesn't work the way "YOU" want it to. Microtrash tries too hard to
>>think for you and totally botches every program it puts out to the public.
|