spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RPM vs MPH question

To: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
Subject: Re: RPM vs MPH question
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 08:37:05 -0500
Cc: <spridgets@autox.team.net>
References: <20050602.064336.3236.2.dmeadow@juno.com> <006a01c56768$ec1d4c90$8d00a8c0@keithhrijwmm4p>
----- Original Message ----- 
From "Keith Turk" <kturk at ala.net>



You really need to measure the tire on the car... wear being what it is and
all.... the ideal way to do it is to measure from the ground to the center
of the axle and then double that number... this takes into account the
amount of squat the tire has....

But we aren't even that fancy at Bonneville...

Keith

***************************

Keith, with deference to your expertise at Bonneville etc., I believe the 
reason one needs the diameter of the tire is to solve for the circumference 
of it -- i.e. the distance covered by one revolution of the wheel.  The 
circumference, for all practical purposes, won't change with tire squat --  
only the portion of the circumference that lies flat on the road.  For that 
reason, I would think it would be more accurate to measure the diameter with 
no load on the tire to get a true (to what extent possible) rolling 
circumference.  I dont know that there is an accurate way to measure tire 
growth under high rpm, but that will also change the circumference and, 
therefore the distance covered per revolution of the wheel.

Tell me where you think I'm wrong here, but this makes perfect sense to my 
tiny, little brain.

Larry Daniels
79 MGB LE
72 Midget
58 Bugeye

"You only need two tools: WD-40 and Duct Tape. If it
doesn't move and should, use the WD-40. If it
shouldn't move and does, use the duct tape."





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>