spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re[2]: K & N again

To: "Spridgets" <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Re[2]: K & N again
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 06:59:26 -0600 reply-type=original with any abuse report
References: <1f1.38cc5e00.2f7ecfe7@aol.com> <000a01c536da$dac437b0$0ef3bec0@NilesAD.von.gov> <424E27CA.4040408@exit109.com> <1787477021.20050401223744@pacifier.com>
> i find it more than somewhat interesting that for years when the cars
> were made as both sprites and midgets, (what about 62 ->69) the midget
> cost more new, and now every price guide that i have seen shows the
> sprite worth more. ...

That is not entirely true. Yes, when the Midget was introduced, it cost 
more. This was because: 1. it WAS an MG and that did mean something at that 
time; and 2. it had a number of extra details and appointments that the 
Sprite did not (sorta like a Buick version of a Chevy). However, by the time 
the Healey contract with Austin expired in 1969, the difference here in the 
US and A was the royalty paid to the Donald, and therefore the Sprite was 
more expensive.

I was reading Classic Motorsports yesterday and finally getting around to an 
article about a couple of concours Jags, an XK120 Alloy and an XK140. The 
article mentioned that, when the XK140 came out in 1955, it was one of the 
first production cars with rack and pinion steering. Maybe so, Mr Cosell, 
but by that time the MG TD with rack and pinion steering had already been 
discontinued in favor of the MG TF, also with R & P. Just thought it was 
funny...
David Lieb 





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>