Re: Air Compressor Settlement

Good point.  That's why it was a "settlement".  The manufacturers felt it was 
to their economic advantage to fob off collections of stuff that cost them way 
under the claimed $50 then to actually bring the compressors up to the specs 
they were advertising them as.  Really, two air hoses and a roll of teflon 
tape???  Sheeeesh.
 
Rick

Jay Fishbein <type79@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
I find it very amusing.

A settlement like this does not make the buyer whole. The buyer who 
purchased a product in good faith is not compensated by buying an 
additional product that he/she may or may not need or want nor by being 
given an additional product. It doesn't address the original claim, that 
the product they were sold was knowingly deficient.


                
---------------------------------
 Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.