spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Split Webers

To: "Biff Jones" <biffjones@erols.com>, <midgetsprite@yahoogroups.com>, "spridgets" <spridgets@autox.team.net>, <bugeye@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: Split Webers
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 17:03:38 -0500
References: <00e801c28cee$17d16860$f2d93ad0@biffjones>
'dual carbs'....  class requirement based
on orig factory config

Paul Tegler
ptegler@cablespeed.com
www.teglerizer.com

----- Original Message -----
From "Biff Jones" <biffjones at erols.com>
To: <midgetsprite@yahoogroups.com>; "spridgets" <spridgets@autox.team.net>;
<bugeye@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 4:29 PM
Subject: Split Webers


> David Jacobs wrote:  "there's a possibility you could blank
> off half of it as they used to do with 'split twin' Webers on race
> Minis/Midgets,
> so the port velocity through the remaining open half would be in the right
> range for fuel atomisation etc."
>
> Which brings up my question, What is/was the advantage of mounting two
DCOE
> Webers with one throat blanked off each over just installing one Weber
with
> each throat working each intake?  I've seen many old pictures where they
did
> that on 1000 - 1275cc engines.  Wouldn't the throat velocity be the same
> with one vice two? Other than the look of a 'pair' of side draft Webers
what
> do you gain??????????????????
>
> Biff Jones
> '59 Bugeye 'Kermit'
> '61 Sprite 'Ole Gray' in "The Healey Book"
> '71 Midget 'Freebie' under restoration
> http://sprites2.homestead.com/

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/spridgets


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>