| To: | DAN WALTERS <SPRIDGET63@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Cooling with blockage |
| Date: | Fri, 23 Aug 2002 19:22:13 -0500 |
| Cc: | Spridgets <spridgets@autox.team.net>, "yahoogroups, midgetsprite" <midgetsprite@yahoogroups.com> |
| References: | <3D66C20B.70D4091F@digitex.net> <001d01c24afe$06461500$8a01a8c0@brick201.nj.comcast.net> FILETIME=[A1E8AA40:01C24B03] |
I just got back from a short ride, and it still is just below 190*. Now what? Brad DAN WALTERS wrote: > True, if you really didn't want to use a thermostat you should at least use > a restrictor in its place. The coolant needs some time in the radiator to > actually cool off. The 160* should work well though. > > Dan Walters > '63 sprite > Brick, NJ > > I have a 160* stat to put in it, once I pulled the > > housing, I noticed it didn't have anything. It is correct that it will > > cool better WITH a thermostat than without, right?? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Fwd: Radiator theory (with sample calc, stay with it), Unknown |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Cooling with blockage, Unknown |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Cooling with blockage, Unknown |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Cooling with blockage, Unknown |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |