| To: | "Robert E. Shlafer" <PilotRob@webtv.net> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 1098 rebuild | 
| Date: | Tue, 24 Jul 2001 19:01:58 -0700 | 
| Organization: | Morriservice | 
| References: | <28638-3B5E23AB-473@storefull-158.iap.bryant.webtv.net> | 
| Other way around, Cap'n! 10CC is the later one with the 2" main bearings.
Everything else being equal, the 10CC engine produced about 4 HP more because of
the stiffer crank.
Regards, Paul A
"Robert E. Shlafer" wrote:
> Wasn't the early 1098 the cc and the later
> wider width bearing model the cg?
>
> Cap'n. Bob
>     '61 :{)
 | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Remember Blue smoke?, Unknown | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | blue smoke?, Unknown | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 1098 rebuild, Unknown | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: 1098 rebuild, Unknown | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |