To: | "Paul A. Asgeirsson" <PAsgeirsson@compuserve.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Timing Vs Over Heating--Longish! |
Date: | Tue, 25 Jul 2000 15:28:35 -0400 |
Cc: | spridgets <spridgets@autox.team.net> |
Organization: | Positive Earth Drivers Club |
References: | <200007251501_MC2-AD6C-7B46@compuserve.com> |
What Paul said! (except I can't find my Frank Zappa 8 track tape) And FWIW, Lucas 23Ds are 15* advance. At least the 3 I have are. > With a generally recognized maximum advance on the timing to prevent > destruction of the engine being about 30 degrees, it's pretty easy to > figure out where you should have an initial dynamic timing set. > > An example would be something like this. > Total vacuum advance= 6 > Maximum centrifugal adv= 16 > Dynamic timing set 8 BTDC > ________ > Total advance degrees 30 -- Frank Clarici Toms River, NJ The bug in the rice bowl http://www.exit109.com/~spritenut |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Timing Vs Over Heating, Unknown |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Real axle nuts, Unknown |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Timing Vs Over Heating--Longish!, Unknown |
Next by Thread: | Re: Timing Vs Over Heating--Longish!, Unknown |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |