Don't count me in on that - I wasn't picking on Bud - just stating my own
point of view. ......................Back to the delete key.
Elizabeth
At 10:51 PM 1/31/00 -0500, James H. Nazarian, Ph.D. wrote:
>Lets all pick on Bud!
>
>This isn't a "sexist thread" (are you implying that the guys are the
sexists?)...
>If I remember a few lines back, it was the gal who pulled the guy into the
car!
>Then, did I not read that she was on top of, and facing him? Or was that
someone's
>fantasy? Sounds like a party to me!!!
>
>Now, for you Michael Graziano; all 5'-11" and 200 lbs. of you. I recall
someone
>with your same name starting another sexist thread regarding a young lady
>complaining about being kissed by a former roommate, yadda, yadda.
>
>Was she the one you described, and I quote "Nope...... And top on (not hers)
>...... Like I said, just uncomfortable. Better in a remote spot outside the
>car."
>
>Fascinating turn. Fascinating thread. Damn sight more exciting than bleeding
>brakes.;-))
>
>Jim
>
>Albert F Jones wrote:
>
>> No Bud,
>>
>> Not at all. It just seems to me that the more responses (this one
>> included) that are made, the more is made of the subject. Ergo, treating
>> it with the ******** that it deserves. We have all, at some time or
>> another perhaps, had no interest in the subject matter of a posting. We
>> all have a delete key. I am quite sure that not everyone is interested in
>> some of my postings to the list, and opt to ignore them. That is what the
>> list is all about isn't it? Those side trips that we often make. Some
>> choose not to take the side road, and other choose to follow it. Perhaps
>> the freedom to choose is paramount, and perhaps the choices that one makes
>> signifies one's maturity.
>>
>> Just my own tuppence worth.
>>
>> Elizabeth
>> Freely admitting that you canchoose to read this or not.
>>
>> At 08:30 PM 1/31/00 -0500, Bud Krueger wrote:
>> >Something's not right here. A year or so ago, this sexist thread would
have
>> >elicited a fair number of comments by now from listers of the fair sex.
Yet,
>> >not a word. Have we lost the Nory's, Carol's, etc.? I hope not.
>> >
>> >Bud
>> >
>> >"Graziano, Michael" wrote:
>> >
>> >> Nope...... And top on (not hers) ...... And I'm 5'11" and 200 lbs.
>> Like I
>> >> said, just uncomfortable. Better in a remote spot outside the car.
>> >>
>> >> > -----Original Message-----
>> >> > From: Brad Fornal [SMTP:toyman@htcomp.net]
>> >> > Sent: Monday, January 31, 2000 6:30 PM
>> >> > To: Larry Macy
>> >> > Cc: Charles D. Sorkin; Spridgets list; MG List
>> >> > Subject: Re: MGA movie sighting
>> >> >
>> >> > IN A MIDGET!! You must be referring to merely Clintonizing, not the
>> actual
>> >> > deed.
>> >> >
>> >> > Larry Macy wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > Like I said, on the Pass seat facing each other.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Anonymous
>> >> > >
>> >> > > At this exact moment in time 1/31/00 12:53 PM,
cdsorkin@ix.netcom.com
>> >> > > made the profound statement:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > >On the bonnet? That's definitely cheating.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >I mean inside, with the top up or down.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >Regards,
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >Charles
>> >> > > >'74 Midget
>> >> > > >'68 Sprite
>> >> > > >cdsorkin@ix.netcom.com
>> >> > > >Bloomfield, NJ
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >P. S. Does this imply that (Non GT) LBC owners could have, on
>> >> > average,
>> >> > > >fewer children?
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain
>> >> confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No
>> >> confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
>> >> If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it
and all
>> >> copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and
notify the
>> >> sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose,
distribute,
>> >> print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
>> >> recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
>> >> the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.
Any
>> >> views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except
>> >> where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
>> >> them to be the views of any such entity.
>> >
>> >--
>> >Bud Krueger
>> >http://home.ici.net/~bkrueger/
>> >52TD
>> >77MGB
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
|