Dave,
But how much did you sell it for after the 2 years? Did you take a loss?
Jay Fishbein
nateley wrote:
> Robert,
> My 66 Rumbler was one of the best cars I ever owned - paid $80 for it and
> drove it 2years,30k miles. It was uglier than a sh*t fence and had
> self-changing oil, but it refused to die. Have fun with it.
> Dave Camp
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Robert Weeks <lists@woozy.com>
> To: <Lancer7676@aol.com>; <lists@woozy.com>; <spridgets@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 1999 8:21 AM
> Subject: RE: got another 69! (no LBC)
>
> > Hey David,
> >
> > They were still making them in 69. Not quite a stylish as the late 50's
> > early '60s ones, more like a Dodge Dart. I took a few photos last night
> and
> > threw them up on the web:
> >
> > http://www.woozy.com/rambler
> >
> >
> > There is an American Rambler Club devoted to the cars from 1958 through
> > 1969, so I guess 69 was the last year.
> >
> > http://www.classicar.com/CLUBS/RAMBLER/RAMBLER.HTM
> >
> > I did some surfing around last night and I was amazed how much more is out
> > there as far as parts, books, eaby listings, etc., for our lbcs than a
> car
> > like this which had many more units sold and has a pretty devoted
> following.
> > We're really lucky in that respect.
> >
> > Happy Holidays,
> >
> > Robert
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-spridgets@autox.team.net
> > [mailto:owner-spridgets@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of Lancer7676@aol.com
> > Sent: Thursday, December 23, 1999 7:03 AM
> > To: lists@woozy.com; spridgets@autox.team.net
> > Subject: Re: got another 69! (no LBC)
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 12/22/99 5:58:48 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> > lists@woozy.com
> > writes:
> >
> > << I just got a 1969 Rambler >>
> >
> > Robert:
> >
> > A '69 Rambler??? I didn't know American Motors was still producing the
> > Rambler in 1969. I had a 1968 Javelin (for which I traded my bought brand
> > new 1966 BJ8) and a 1970 AMX when they were new, but I thought they hadn't
> > made a Rambler since the early '60's.
> >
> > --David C.
> >
> >
|