spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: shorrock vs. judson?

To: type79@ix.netcom.com, BANJOJOHN@aol.com
Subject: Re: shorrock vs. judson?
From: Daniel1312@aol.com
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 1999 08:16:43 EST
Cc: spridgets@autox.team.net
Reply-to: Daniel1312@aol.com
Sender: owner-spridgets@autox.team.net
Neither unit is very keen on prolonged high rpm usage and ultimately this 
limits power (ie a 286 cammed 1275 running at 6,500 will produce more power 
and can rev to 7,000 before shifting to stay in the power which ought to be 
over 100bhp)

Neither Shorrock or Judson produce as much boost as a turbo (about 6.5psi??)

One reason Shorrock and Judson engine cars seem to not produce as much power 
as might be expected is that often they are fitted on a totally stock engine 
when they would benefit from other tuning such as a decent ported big valve 
head, performance exhaust, etc.


Daniel1312

In a message dated 04/12/99 09:54:23 Pacific Standard Time, 
type79@ix.netcom.com writes:

<< Does
 > anyone know anything about Shorrock SC as compared with Judson?  Does 
anyone
 > have either of these running on their car currently.  how is the boost? >>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>