| To: | "'Mike Gigante'" <mikeg@vicnet.net.au> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: Radiator Stuff |
| From: | "Elliott, Patrick" <PElliott@attws-wr.swest.attws.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 8 Dec 1998 16:09:19 -0800 |
| Cc: | "spridgets@Autox.Team.Net" <spridgets@Autox.Team.Net> |
| Reply-to: | "Elliott, Patrick" <PElliott@attws-wr.swest.attws.com> |
| Sender: | owner-spridgets@Autox.Team.Net |
>"Or we could end up with some calculus to describe theoretical
>performance. Some might remember this *did* happen once
>when the discussion was about thermostat removal and whether
>faster flow was better than slower flow."
>Mike"
This would be a good time for an archive.
Mike Said:
>" Since the factory changed over to the crossflow for later models,
presumably they
> thought there'd be some improvement."
Not necessarily true. probably easier and cheaper to produce and fit
crossflows. A downflow has a few more parts and looks more complex to make.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Radiator Stuff, Mike Gigante |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Radiator Stuff, Ron Soave |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Radiator Stuff, Mike Gigante |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Radiator Stuff, Ron Soave |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |