spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Iron bellhousing - heavy or what?

To: William Davies <bill@rarebits4classics.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Iron bellhousing - heavy or what?
From: Joe Curry <Spitlist@gte.net>
Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2003 15:57:57 -0700
William Davies wrote:
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Douglas Braun <doug@dougbraun.com>
> 
> > Cast iron is about 3x heavier than aluminum, so the aluminum model
> > must be about 25% thinner than the cast iron ones.  I can see why
> > the old, thin aluminum bellhousings are considered a bit flimsy
> > for hopped-up Spit engines.
> 
> I was talking to one of the Triumph works drivers at the Stoneleigh Triumph 
>Show earlier today. He suggested alloy bellhousings should be sold in pairs - 
>this would provide a replacement for when they crack around the bottom edge 
>just inbard of the flange! I've never seen this myself, but I guess the 
>Spitfires he drives are somewhat more powerful than any I've owned!
>     Cheers,
>         Bill.
> 

I don't know what the problem is.  As long as you use the thicker one
you should not have any trouble.  I have had 2 of them (still have one)
and have never had any problems.  Bob Totten now has one of them and
(knock on wood) I doubt he has or will have any trouble either.

Joe

///  spitfires@autox.team.net mailing list
///  or try  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>