spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Why 90w oil?

To: Jim Muller <jimmuller@pop.mail.rcn.net>
Subject: Re: Why 90w oil?
From: "T. .R. Dafforn" <td214@cam.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:14:40 +0100
Because the grease in the 1950s and 1960s turned to a sort of solid waxy
substance after a few months of rain, salt, and the elements!!
Not good as a lubircator. New LM greases are much better
Cheers
Tim
PS: you may have started a big debate!
Jim Muller wrote:

> Does anyone know why Triumph specified 90w oil instead of grease when
> lub'ing the trunnions on the Spitfire front suspension?
>
> Tanks.
>
> [This note is real query but it is also a test...(2)]
>
> Jim Muller
> jimmuller@pop.rcn.com
> '80 Spitfire (Percy)
>

--
Tim Dafforn
University of Cambridge
Structural Medicine Unit
Cambridge Institute for Medical Research
Wellcome Trust Centre for Molecular Mechanisms of Disease
Hills Rd, Cambridge CB2 2XY.
UK
Tel. (01223) 763230
Fax. (01223) 336827
http://smokeroom.cimr.cam.ac.uk/

///  spitfires@autox.team.net mailing list
///  To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
///  with nothing in it but
///
///     unsubscribe spitfires
///


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>