shop-talk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Shop-talk] Classic car insurance tangents

To: "Tim ." <tims_datsun_stuff@outlook.com>
Subject: Re: [Shop-talk] Classic car insurance tangents
From: Jeff Scarbrough <fishplate@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 16:32:07 -0500
Cc: Shop Talk <shop-talk@autox.team.net>
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: shop-talk@autox.team.net
References: <CY1PR13MB050362EB8DFAEAB92B72F458B4DA0@CY1PR13MB0503.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Tim . <tims_datsun_stuff@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> First a question: How was your vehicle's value decided?

Hagerty has an agreed-on value, at least for me.

>  Well, because my
> daughter didn't have her own car, grundy denied me coverage stating "the
> teen driver might take the Roadster for a drive because she didn't have her
> own car". (<-----this is almost verbatim)

That's how you can get a classic car, agreed-on value policy for your
car at a fraction of what your regular car insurance would cost.
Because even though your kid is a good kid, someone else's isn't.  And
insurance is a pooled risk.

Jeff Scarbrough
Corrosion Acres, Ga.
_______________________________________________

Shop-talk@autox.team.net
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>