morgans
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RE:"Real toilets"

To: "David P. Crandall" <davidc@netwrk.org>,
Subject: Re: RE:"Real toilets"
From: "Greg Solow" <gregmogdoc@surfnetusa.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 22:12:49 -0700
Not a real Morgan item, but, we recently installed a new toilet in our
house.  It is a "TOTO" brand  1.6 gallon, one peice (the tank and the bowl
are made as one unit).  It is smaller physically than our old American
Standard  brand 7 gallon toilet, and flushes GREAT.  There is a Web site
that a plumber in Oregon put together that rates many brands of toilets and
the TOTO is rated the highest.  After 6 months we are still overjoyed with
the way that it flushes, as stange as that may seem. The Web site is
terry@terrylove.com
                                                                    Regards,
Greg Solow






----- Original Message -----
From: David P. Crandall <davidc@netwrk.org>
To: Vandergraaf, Chuck <vandergraaft@aecl.ca>; <morgans@autox.team.net>
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2000 3:08 PM
Subject: RE:"Real toilets"


> Chuck - you are on the verge of getting into a major political issue
> that  may still surface in our upchucking [sorry, upcoming] presidential
> charade.  The question is: how much water is needed to insure a "fresh
> bowl".  Some years back our idiot bureaucrats decided that the
> then-standard three gallon model was too wasteful and mandated a puny one
> and a half gallon model hardly capable of handling the output of a
> fully-nourished Morganeer after a monthly noggin, let alone all the
regular
> folks.  The result, much like that of paper towels and toilet tissue made
> of recycled paper, folks used three times as much to achieve the result
> that previously was achieved with a single wipe or flush.
>
> Presently, although there are finally some models available [allegedly]
> that both meet the US specs and use only the puny 1 1/2 ration, many wise
> lads are stealing across the border to your part of the world and snagging
> a high-quality 3-galloner that is smuggled across the border.  This
> produces the ludicrous situation of new master bathrooms being built that
> have hot tubs and hot and cold running bathing wenchs but sport a white
$69
> throne that will meet the code and stay in just until the certificate of
> occupancy is issued then voila!  The "real toilet" is quickly installed to
> match the premium tile color scheme etc.
>
> Now, neither candidate has declared himself on this issue, but I'm sure it
> will surface before November and could well be pivotal.  Let's hope so,
> because otherwise the issues of most importance to Americans are going to
> get short shrift with this duo of duds, IMHO.
>
> Regards, David [who has avoided all this by not every building a master
> bathroom]
>
> At 04:57 PM 6/19/00 -0400, you wrote:
> >Dick,
> >
> >Two questions:
> >How can we keep our cars up here if you guys keep buying them?  Yeah, I
> >know, we should not sell them.
> >Importing "real toilets" from "up here?"  What do you use now in Oregon?
> >(oops, three questions, but I answered one already)
> >
> >Chuck Vandergraaf in Manitoba and co-owner (with his wife) of two "real
> >toilets" in the house (and a fake one? In the boat)
>
> David P. Crandall, President
> The NETWORK Inc.
> 136 Fenno Drive
> Rowley MA 01969-1004 USA
> 800-877-5400 [O] 978-948-7836 [F]
> Changing How People Work, Live and Play
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>