| To: | "Todd Mullins" <muses@cableone.net>, <mgs@autox.team.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Intermittant losses in power |
| From: | "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk> |
| Date: | Sat, 4 Feb 2006 14:59:20 -0000 |
Concentric throttle return springs is about the only advantage in the HIF.
The separate choke mechanism is more to go wrong and has its own O-rings to
deteriorate and leak, plus another on the bottom cover, plus other ports in
the body to block. And the poppet valve is a positive disadvantage. I have
HSs on my 73 roadster and HIFs on my 75 V8 and it is always the HIFs that
have given me problems.
PaulH.
----- Original Message -----
> This is one reason I've always preferred the HIF design. Other
> reasons are the concentric throttle return springs, the separate cold-
> start enrichment ("choke") circuit
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Do these people insure little old sportscars?, Eric Erickson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Mark Evans MG for sale [way OT] (Catapults etc.), Paul Hunt |
| Previous by Thread: | Do these people insure little old sportscars?, Eric Erickson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Mark Evans MG for sale [way OT] (Catapults etc.), Paul Hunt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |