land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Modified Pickup rules

To: "kturk@ala.net" <kturk@ala.net>,
Subject: RE: Modified Pickup rules
From: Beth Butters <bbutters@dmi.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 12:20:43 -0800
        Danial, could you tell me if  you have to run the tail gate up in  
modified pick up ??  Been thincking about the class and it would make a 
difference as to which style of box I ran. Thanks L. Kvach Butters

----------
From:  Daniel Warner[SMTP:dwarner@electrorent.com]
Sent:  Wednesday, November 10, 1999 7:50 AM
To:  kturk@ala.net
Cc:  Land Speed
Subject:  Modified Pickup rules

By-laws, minutes, tribal knowledge - access to these items probably would
not help vis a vis rules. The best route if a rule concern exists is to
contact the proper class committee. If you don't know the committee chair
directly, contact through the current head tech guy as listed in the rule
book is the way to go.

Questions regards the way an event operates can be answered via a letter to
the Board, via the SCTA-BNI office or through this forum.

Dan

-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Turk <kturk@ala.net>
To: Daniel Warner <dwarner@electrorent.com>; dferguso@ebmail.gdeb.com
<dferguso@ebmail.gdeb.com>
Cc: Land Speed <land-speed@autox.team.net>
Date: Wednesday, November 10, 1999 6:17 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: spoilers


>Dan.... As Chuck mentioned from the SCCA folks.. rule book.... we be Thin
>
>I love our rule book for it's simplicity... sure we can argue about certain
>Items... but the overall rules are great in their latitude....
>
>I do have a question about things that have been discussed in the past and
>settled on that are not in the rule book... someone mentioned By-laws and
>minutes or some other form of clarification about the rules.... Is there
>more that I should be reading?
>
>Keith Turk.... (happy to get through tech... that first time)
>
>----------
>> From: Daniel Warner <dwarner@electrorent.com>
>> To: dferguso@ebmail.gdeb.com
>> Cc: Land Speed <land-speed@autox.team.net>
>> Subject: Re: Fw: spoilers
>> Date: Wednesday, November 10, 1999 7:35 AM
>>
>> The definition in the rulebook for spoiler vrs. wings has been around for
>a
>> long time. Page 38, item h, 2nd sentence refers to single aero surface.
>> Generally a single surface device is air flow over the top, a spoiler
>with
>> air flow over the top and bottom is defined as a wing by the SCTA-BNI.
>Some
>> aero people may disagree in this area, however, to keep it simple this is
>> the way the SCTA sees it.
>>
>> On a production  car with a spoiler/wing if the device is raised from the
>> body it is defined as a wing also.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dferguso@ebmail.gdeb.com <dferguso@ebmail.gdeb.com>
>> To: dwarner@electrorent.com <dwarner@electrorent.com>;
>> Land-speed@autox.team.net <Land-speed@autox.team.net>
>> Date: Tuesday, November 09, 1999 12:19 PM
>> Subject: Re: Fw: spoilers
>>
>>
>> >hi dan, thanks for the compliment, it was a hell of alot of work to
>design
>> >and build it.   on the spoiler, should i take it that if i say why i
>think
>> >it fully meets the requirements of the 98 and 99 scta rules ( i fabbed
>it
>> >myself when the 98 rules were applicable) that the 2000 rules will be
>> >deliberately modified to send this spoiler to the scrapyard ? wow- i
>dont
>> >know how to comment
>> >
>> >doug@black radon engineering
>> >
>> >
>>
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>