land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Horsepower and Wings

To: <land-speed@autox.team.net>, "dahlgren" <dahlgren@uconect.net>,
Subject: Re: Horsepower and Wings
From: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 18:08:51 -0500
ahhh you know that thing that hangs out on the back of the car that can be
what.. 10" long... and so on... and so forth.. (don't have the rule book
with me)
K

----------
> From: Lawrence E. Mayfield <mayfield@traveller.com>
> To: Keith Turk <kturk@ala.net>; land-speed@autox.team.net; dahlgren
<dahlgren@uconect.net>
> Subject: Re: Horsepower and Wings
> Date: Wednesday, June 09, 1999 12:09 PM
> 
> Hey, you guys talking wings or spoilers? Wings are supposed to be exactly
> like offered from factory. Spoilers are a different thing...as you point
> out to me Keith.. 
> 
> mayf
> 
> 
> At 03:18 PM 6/9/99 -0500, Keith Turk wrote:
> >I agree and that is why we are going to take a second deck lid with a
Wing
> >that meets the requirements as well as allows the air to close a little
> >later behind the car...
> >
> >it has to be adjustable.... I think. to allow for the minimum
settings...
> >
> >We learned a good bit this weekend about driving the car with some info
we
> >downloaded after the passes.. I was a little to hard on the throttle
during
> >our first meet with the Motor and Brad was a little soft....This meet we
> >were much better... though his shifts still took 
> >
> >The Salt is going to require a ton of finesse... I can see that
already...
> >but we still have to put the power down.... 
> >
> >Speaking of Spinning... I suppose I ought to consider a track bar to aid
in
> >locating the rear end and body... as a helper... in the event of a
spin...
> >
> >Keith
> >----------
> >> From: dahlgren <dahlgren@uconect.net>
> >> To: Keith Turk <kturk@ala.net>
> >> Subject: Re: Horsepower and Wings
> >> Date: Wednesday, June 09, 1999 1:49 PM
> >> 
> >> A wing can be adjusted to give a lot or almost no down force and the
> >> drag at the low settings is very slight. it also does not add very
much
> >> drag until you are going very fast. ballast hurts you every where. It
> >> takes more time and distance to get moving and adds a lot of rolling
> >> resistance. At least my way of looking at it.. At 1600 lbs and 425 hp
> >> traction has been no problem with no wing so far it all depends on how
> >> YOU drive it....
> >> Dave Dahlgren
> >> 
> >> Keith Turk wrote:
> >> > 
> >> > I was talking with Darrell off line here a bit ago and a thought
came
> >to my
> >> > mind.....
> >> > 
> >> > I am dead set against running a wing on my car if I can get away
with
> >it...
> >> > (based on stability at speed)
> >> > 
> >> > anykind of aerodynamic tool which Produces downforce also produces
> >drag...
> >> > and to move drag takes HP...
> >> > 
> >> > I heard a comment here a couple of weeks ago about us having more HP
> >then
> >> > the traction allows... is this the case out there for most of you?
> >> > 
> >> > Keith Turk
> >> > Austin Healey 100, Bugeye, Box sprites, Bonneville Camaro ( Land
Speed
> >> > Racer)
> >
> 
> 
> 
> L.E. Mayfield
> 124 Maximillion Drive
> Madison, Al. 35758-8171
> 1-256-837-1051
> 
> http://www.hsv.tis.net/~mayfield
> 
> DrMayf@AOL.com
> mayfield@traveller.com <<<<preferred
> 
> 
> Bonneville Land Speed Racer, '66 Hydroplane Drag Boat (390 FE)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>