healeys
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Healeys] Armstrong 6075 ft. shocks

To: gradea1@charter.net
Subject: Re: [Healeys] Armstrong 6075 ft. shocks
From: Bob Spidell <bspidell@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 18:37:12 -0700
Cc: "'healeys@autox.team.net'" <healeys@autox.team.net>
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: healeys@autox.team.net
References: <9225528c947305b166853bf9de8bb7eeef6a6974@webmail>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0
No problemo, Hank; I should have been more clear. I have a 7psi cap 
coming from Tom Monaco, along with a County water pump; the 'Bastuck 
uprated' pump didn't work out (long story).

Thanks, all, for the replies.

Bob


On 7/19/2022 5:48 PM, gradea1@charter.net wrote:
> Final note on the Radiator Pressure cap inquiry...yes Bob, you did ask 
> for which one was proper, not that you could improve the system with 
> more pressure. I misread your comment. Sorry.
>
> The September 1954 Service Manual for the 100 states a 7 lb. cap as 
> correct for that time period.
>
> Some of the earlier production vehicles were equipped with 4 lb. caps 
> but could be "upgraded" to a 7 pounder with no consequences, I assume. 
> I use a 4 lb. cap, as that is what the car came with in 1953.
>
> In that same volume, under Rear Axle the shocks are described as 
> "double acting hydraulic".  I have that same document sheet listing 
> the various shocks available with no prefixes, and my shocks have an R 
> raised on the body. That is on the LH shock...Hank
>

_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
Suggested annual donation  $12.75

Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/healeys 
http://autox.team.net/archive/healeys

Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys

Unsubscribe/Manage: 
http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/healeys/mharc@autox.team.net

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>