Hello Simon,
I noticed your question to the Austin Healey automobile list.
For Austin Healey universal joints, if you are having problems with
obtaining these,purshase for the Land Rover.
You may even find them to be more cost effective too.
Regards.
David.
www.bighealey.ltd.uk
----- Original Message -----
From: "Simon Lachlan" <simon.lachlan@homecall.co.uk>
To: "'Greg Lemon'" <glemon@neb.rr.com>; "'Blue One Hundred'"
<healey.nut@gmail.com>; <Healeys@autox.team.net>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 2:35 PM
Subject: RE: Question - MGB & Austin Healey Universal Joints
> From memory, I'd think that they're not the same, though I've never had
the
> pleasure of physically comparing!
> 1) The Healey one must have been around for a while when the B came on
> stream.
> 2) I'd have thought the B one would be too weedy for the Healey and the
> Healey one too bulky for the B.
> Similar, but not "the same"
> Simon.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-healeys@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-healeys@autox.team.net]
On
> Behalf Of Greg Lemon
> Sent: 22 February 2005 13:03
> To: Blue One Hundred; Healeys@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: Question - MGB & Austin Healey Universal Joints
>
> Victoria British lists a DIFFERENT part number for MGB vs. Big Healey
> U-joint, further I knoweth not.
>
> Greg Lemon
> 54 BN1
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Blue One Hundred" <healey.nut@gmail.com>
> To: <Healeys@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 5:44 AM
> Subject: Question - MGB & Austin Healey Universal Joints
>
>
> > If I'm not mistaken, aren't the 6 cylinder healey U-Joints and MGB
> > U-Joints the same? Please let me know... it may be easier to source a
> > U-Joint in Hong Kong if this is the case.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Alan
> >
> > '53 BN1 '64 BJ8
|