The theory about squish area in two strokes is that besides generating
turbulence (thus mixing) and moving the majority of the mix to the middle of
the head, that the relatively cool surfaces in close proximity to the mix slow
the flame front headed for the cylinder wall and prevent detonation. If the
squish band is too tight the gasses cool too much and don?t burn to the edges.
The piston is still moving upwards at that point so partially burned gases push
back into the non-squish area as well and screw up complete burning. One of the
reasons that head and piston tops needed to be decarbonized was closing up the
squish gap and losing horsepower.
At least that?s what Gordon Jennings said. I always believed him.
> On Aug 23, 2017, at 6:46 PM, Kas Kastner via Fot <fot at autox.team.net>
> wrote:
>
> This is a very interesting subject. In the thousands of hours of dyno
> testing I did in the 60's, the squish area clearance was never addressed with
> exception of making certain the piston did not hit the head. Off hand, when
> the clearance is too close it rather sounds like there is insufficient volume
> in the squish at TDC to do its job of properly exciting the balance of fuel
> mixture when it squirts back into the combustion chamber thus making a better
> mixed and thus more powerful combustion moment. Or maybe something else :-)
>
> Never be beaten by equipment.
>
>
> Interesting... We found 1.5 mm in the 250 two strokes was the best....
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
>> On dyno test we found a disturbing issue that lowers the power if the piston
>> to head clearance is less than 0.039?.
>>
>> We didn?t find a cause for this but tested thoroughly clearances from
>> 0.0236? upwards.
>>
>> Best power reading was with 0.0472?.
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>>
>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. August 2017 23:52
>> Betreff: Re: [Fot] FW: Grattan VSCDA next weekend? piston/head clearance
>>
>>
>>
>> With the good rods and reasonable rpm you have plenty of clearance.
>> You don't want too much clearance either cuz then it lessens the "squish"
>> effect.
>> The idea is to have enough clearance for all running conditions, plus a few
>> thou safety margin, and no more.
>> Glen
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> Sent: Wed, Aug 23, 2017 3:38 pm
>> Subject: RE: [Fot] FW: Grattan VSCDA next weekend? piston/head clearance
>>
>> The Payen head gasket last used was compressed to 0.055 at the fire ring.
>> So, with the 0.010 pop-up that I have from the all efforts to deck the
>> block, I will have 0.045 clearance. I have Carrillo rods and we try to stay
>> to under 6000 RPM for engine ?longevity?. (Not sure ?longevity? is a term
>> that can be used with a race engine!) At the most we?ll hit 6200 or 6300
>> RPM briefly before upshifting. Therefore, I should be within the 0.030
>> clearance that you recommended. It will be interesting to see what the top
>> of the pistons looks like on the next rebuild with regard to carbon build up
>> in the squish area.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the advice and all the other comments on this subject. All much
>> appreciated. Still a lot to learn?
>>
>>
>>
>> Tim
>>
>>
>>
>> P.S. Finally got everything together on the engine and about ready to mate
>> up to the transmission and put back in the car. Looking forward to ELVF
>> next month. That will be the test.
>>
>> ? <>
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 5:27 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Fot] FW: Grattan VSCDA next weekend?
>>
>>
>>
>> Check the gasket thickness, it depends on what piston/wall clearance, rods,
>> and RPM you use.
>> You generally need around .030 piston/head with stock rods, so add that to
>> your pop-up of .010 for minimum gasket thickness.
>> If you run good rods you can run a little less before the pistons smack the
>> head.
>> It's perfect when there isn't any carbon build up on the piston tops under
>> the squish area.
>> When it's not right, it goes BRRRRRRRRRRRRR...
>> HTH
>> Glen
>>
>>
>>
>> After all the machining to get the stick out
>> right I now have the pistons sticking up about 0.010 above the tops of the
>> liners. No problem with the composite Payen head gasket.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> Sent: Wed, Aug 16, 2017 5:48 pm
>> Subject: [Fot] FW: Grattan VSCDA next weekend?
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 12:20 PM
>> Subject: RE: [Fot] Grattan VSCDA next weekend?
>>
>> Sadly, we won't be able to make it.
>>
>> I just got the block back from the machine shop last Tuesday. Not enough
>> time to get everything together and in the car and ready to go by Thursday.
>> The good news is the liner stick out is the 0.004 the machine shop said they
>> machined the liner seats and deck to. It's still a bitch to measure, as the
>> liners "wobble" on the seats and when you're looking for 0.004 it's a
>> problem. I finally have a decent dial indicator gage setup to at least give
>> repeatable readings. The figure 8's used was a set of copper ones I had
>> that measured 0.016. The machining was done on a single setup on a Rottler
>> floor type vertical 4-inch spindle milling/boring machine. These are
>> special purpose machine tools built specifically to machine engine parts,
>> such as blocks and heads. After all the machining to get the stick out
>> right I now have the pistons sticking up about 0.010 above the tops of the
>> liners. No problem with the composite Payen head gasket.
>>
>> Thanks for all the responses to the Figure 8 gasket question. I did
>> eventually hear back from Moss UK. They said their steel fig. 8's are 0.016
>> and their copper fig. 8's were 0.018. No explanation regarding the
>> different thickness other that they have not had reported problems with the
>> gaskets. I'm not sure where the 0.020 thick copper ones that I measured
>> came from or for that matter, the 0.016 thick copper ones I'm using.
>>
>> Tim & Ryan Murphy
>> 1961 ('61, it is Comm. No. 511 and was built in 1961 per British Heritage)
>> TR4 #317 BRG
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> Fot
>> Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2017 6:21 PM
>> Subject: [Fot] Grattan VSCDA next weekend?
>>
>> Anyone else going to Grattan next weekend?
>>
>> Vroom, vroom, Tony Drews
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> http://www.fot-racing.com <http://www.fot-racing.com/>
>>
>> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html <http://www.team.net/donate.html>
>> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive <http://www.team.net/archive>
>> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums <http://www.team.net/forums>
>> Unsubscribe/Manage:
>> http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/timmmurphh at gmail.com
>> <http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/timmmurphh at gmail.com>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> http://www.fot-racing.com <http://www.fot-racing.com/>
>>
>> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html <http://www.team.net/donate.html>
>> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive <http://www.team.net/archive>
>> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums <http://www.team.net/forums>
>> Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/fubog1 at
>> aol.com <http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/fubog1 at
>> aol.com>_______________________________________________
>>
>> http://www.fot-racing.com <http://www.fot-racing.com/>
>>
>> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html <http://www.team.net/donate.html>
>> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive <http://www.team.net/archive>
>> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums <http://www.team.net/forums>
>> Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/jhasty at
>> mhc-law.com <http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/jhasty at mhc-law.com>
>>
>>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission has been sent by a
> law firm on a legal matter. It may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged, proprietary, or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you
> are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not
> authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message, any part
> of it, or any attachments. If you have received this message in error, please
> delete this message and any attachments from your system without reading the
> content and notify the sender immediately of the inadvertent transmission.
> There is no intent on the part of the sender to waive any privilege,
> including the attorney-client privilege, that may attach to this
> communication. Thank you for your cooperation. 11 U.S.C. 528(a)(4) NOTICE. We
> are a debt relief agency. We help people file for bankruptcy relief under the
> federal Bankruptcy Code.
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> http://www.fot-racing.com <http://www.fot-racing.com/>
>
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html <http://www.team.net/donate.html>
> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive <http://www.team.net/archive>
> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums <http://www.team.net/forums>
> Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/kaskastner at
> gmail.com <http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/kaskastner at gmail.com>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fot at autox.team.net
>
> http://www.fot-racing.com
>
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/bill at
> ponostyle.com
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20170823/9c657a86/attachment.html>
|