Re: "Guest" entries and Slush1 schedule.

[dc@panix.com (David W. Crawford)]

"Carl Merritt" <cmerritt@luminous.com> writes:

> First off, no schedule is up for Slush round 1 yet, any reason to assume
> it won't be the natural progression from the last regular season event?


Slush tends to have 6 rungroups, not 8 like the summer championship
season.  So the change is more than a nautural 'progression'.

eg, from last year
http://www.sfrscca.org/solo2/Results/2004/Slush/round1_info.html

David W. Crawford    <dc@omor.com>