ba-autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Helmet Rating.

To: "Jerry Mouton" <jerry@moutons.org>,
Subject: Re: Helmet Rating.
From: "Kevin Stevens" <Kevin_Stevens@Bigfoot.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 19:30:13 -0800
Jerry's right.  I was apparently using a non-Gregorian calendar.

--  KeS

> Gee, wouldn't it be usable through 2010?
> In 2009 I presume the "current" standard would be
> '05, and the previous two would be '00 and '95...
>
> Right?
>
> Jerry
>
> Jerry Mouton        mailto:jerry@moutons.org    Laissez les bons temps
> rouler!
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>
> To: <vijay@gadad.net>; <ba-autox@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 11:14 AM
> Subject: Re: Helmet Rating.
>
>
> > The rule has allowed for the prior two certification levels for quite some
> > time.  Unless that rule changes, or Snell starts releasing new levels more
> > frequently, then a Snell 95 helmet would be usable through 2005.
> >
> >
> > KeS
> >
> > >I'm debating whether to pick up a '95 or a '00 rated helmet.  Does
> > >anyone know for how much longer the '95 helmets will be valid?  If
> > >'90 helmets are OK now, does that mean I can get at least 5 years out of
> > >the '95 helmet?
> > >
> > >Thanks.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Vijay Gadad
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>