autox
[Top] [All Lists]

re: mr2 why always 1993?

To: ax-digest@autox.team.net
Subject: re: mr2 why always 1993?
From: David Hillman <hillman@planet-torque.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 11:58:22 -0500 (EST)
Charlie wrote...
> The rear lower trailing arms, or lower control arms, got longer in '93,
> making it rotate less than '91-2.

   They did, but it's an insignificant difference, compared to what you
can do with alignment.  You can make a '91 impossible to spin, and you
make a '93 diabolical, if you want to.

--
 David Hillman
 #26 B1




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • re: mr2 why always 1993?, David Hillman <=