autox
[Top] [All Lists]

April Fast Track shock proposals *personal opinion*

To: TeamZ06@aol.com
Subject: April Fast Track shock proposals *personal opinion*
From: Smokerbros@aol.com
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 10:53:52 EST
In a message dated 3/9/02 6:03:33 PM Pacific Standard Time, TeamZ06 writes:


> It will be immaterial as a shorter body is almost always accompanied by a 
> shorter shaft.  It's a packaging constraint.  So even if you add a spacer 
> to the body the shaft length/travel range will still be out of spec; in 
> fact, more so because the travel will be shortened even further by the 
> spacer thickness.

Remember that the allowances as they were written were there to allow shocks 
that were provided by the shock manufacturers that weren't dimensionally 
correct.  This was mostly because shock manufacturers would use one part 
number for several applications.  Current high tech shock manufacturers will 
build a shock to whatever dimensions you specify.  So, someone who 
opportunistically took advantage of the allowance may have to have their 
shocks reconfigured by the manufacturer.  Add a spacer to the shock body, and 
get a new shaft made, and reassemble your shocks to the OE dimension...

Charlie

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Partial archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • April Fast Track shock proposals *personal opinion*, Smokerbros <=