RE: Does anybody think this is covered under C&C??? :-)

To:	"'team.net'" <autox@autox.team.net>
Subject:	RE: Does anybody think this is covered under C&C??? :-)
From:	"Ayer, John K" <John.Ayer@PSS.Boeing.com>
Date:	Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:09:25 -0700

>>Arthur ("If I didn't have a conscience, I'd be rich" edition.)


God, if it were only that easy,,,

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Does anybody think this is covered under C&C??? :-), Larry Re: Does anybody think this is covered under C&C??? :-), bfuhrman RE: Does anybody think this is covered under C&C??? :-), Bruce Haden RE: Does anybody think this is covered under C&C??? :-), Eric Salem RE: Does anybody think this is covered under C&C??? :-), Brad Cox RE: Does anybody think this is covered under C&C??? :-), Ayer, John K <= Does anybody think this is covered under C&C??? :-), Arthur Emerson Re: Does anybody think this is covered under C&C??? :-), Scot Zediker Re: Does anybody think this is covered under C&C??? :-), Gail/Sid deLeon RE: Does anybody think this is covered under C&C??? :-), Arthur Emerson Re: Does anybody think this is covered under C&C??? :-), Rush

Previous by Date:	RE: Does anybody think this is covered under C&C??? :-), Brad Cox
Next by Date:	Does anybody think this is covered under C&C??? :-), Arthur Emerson
Previous by Thread:	RE: Does anybody think this is covered under C&C??? :-), Brad Cox
Next by Thread:	Does anybody think this is covered under C&C??? :-), Arthur Emerson
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]