| To: | <dg50@daimlerchrysler.com>, <autox@autox.team.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Why DOT? Why not slicks? |
| From: | "David Hawkins" <otgrouch@twosrus.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 22 Apr 1999 10:21:26 -0500 |
>Why do we require DOT race tires? Why not allow race slicks too? > >Good enough for CP, good enough for ESP - and besides, a g-force has a lower >void ratio than a current F1 tire. Excuse me? Good enough for ESP? Has there been a rule change that I didn't see? 14.3 Tires: Tires must meet the eligibility requirements for stock category. David 'I'd love to run slicks' Hawkins 85 Mr2 CSP TLS 15 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Best Rain autox/street tire?, Eric Linnhoff |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Why DOT? Why not slicks?, Eric Linnhoff |
| Previous by Thread: | Why DOT? Why not slicks?, dg50 |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Why DOT? Why not slicks?, Eric Linnhoff |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |