CHARLES J VOBORIL wrote:
> I suggest that from this point on,
> we spend time considering what ELSE could be
> done to A and B Mod to better accommodate
> a wide variety of cars with more reasonable parity.
>
> Given we have an almost 2:1 power to weight discrepancy in B-mod,
> I submit that this is beyond what is normally accommodated
> in ANY other single Solo 2 class.
>
> Does anyone see any problem with divvying up the cars among:
> A-Mod/1, A-Mod/2,
> B-Mod/1, B-Mod/2 ?
In this conext, I'm no longer directly effected and also not on the MAC
or SEB, however:
I don't see value in an A-Mod/2. That is in spite of my one season in
AM being in a car that probably may have qualified for it and I may have
finshed well in such a class. There aren't a lot of cars that would
qualify and my opinion is that a class for old Super-V's and the like
won't do much for the sport. ...I could be wrong. On second thought, I
suppose that A-Mod/2 could be a place for unballasted single seat DSR's
or others that people are afraid of in the current BM.
If anything is to be done, B-Mod/2 does sound like a good move. ...and
while your at it I'd put the S2000 there too! ;-)
How about create a B-Mod/2 class and then schedule B-Mod/1 for
eliminating or reducing solo ballast about 3 or 4 years from now?
Again, other than the S2000 comment, the above wouldn't effect me until
the hypothetical day came along that I was ready to move up in the world.
Overall, _I_ like the direction of this suggestion. The primary concern
would be the long term effect of arbitrarily adding more classes.
Cheers!
Ty
--
Tyson D Sawyer
46CM '85 Reynard 85F "The Red Headed Stepchild"
118AM '72 Tui Super-V 2002
37DS '98 Neon ACR 1997-2001
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/autox-cm
|