| To: | <6pack@autox.team.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Girling vs. Lockheed Hydraulics |
| From: | "Jerry Shaw" <jcs104@home.com> |
| Date: | Sat, 21 Jul 2001 21:47:30 -0400 |
I've been putting together my LBC kit car, a.k.a., '74 TR6. I've had occasion to purchase both Girling and Lockheed hydraulics. It sees that Lockheed has a significant edge in quality of design and execution. For example, I just got a Lockheed clutch slave that is clearly superior in design to the Girling it replaces, but costs more than a tad more. Any thoughts on the subject by the more experienced in this discussion group? Jerry Shaw CF20490UO |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TR6 valve adjustment, John Uloth |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Girling vs. Lockheed Hydraulics, Sally or Dick Taylor |
| Previous by Thread: | TR6 valve adjustment, John Uloth |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Girling vs. Lockheed Hydraulics, Sally or Dick Taylor |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |