Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Tiger\s+rear\s+axle\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Tiger\s+rear\s+axle\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Tigers] Tiger rear axle (score: 1): Author: snakebit289 <snakebit289@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 09:00:50 -0700 (PDT); You'll probably get more detailed info soon, but IIRC, Salisbury was the UK manufacturer and many people describe the design as a Dana 44 type, which is the type used on some Jeeps with solid rear ax; /html/tigers/2013-08/msg00044.html (7,840 bytes)
2. [Tigers] Tiger Rear Axle (score: 1): Author: "Rense, Mark (GE, Appl & Light)" <mark.rense@ge.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 19:07:44 +0000; Rande, just rebuilt my Salisbury rear end last month, it is a DANA 44 design built by Salisbury, they were a subsidiary of Dana at the time. Every part that went into the rebuild was standard for a D; /html/tigers/2014-07/msg00012.html (10,795 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Axle (score: 1): Author: Tom Parker <tkparker1941@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 15:22:49 -0400; The Tiger is a driver's car. It's not meant (in my opinion) to sit on a trailer or be restored to "as-built perfection; it was never a perfect car anyway. If you go "L.A.T." or up the engine power or; /html/tigers/2014-07/msg00013.html (12,723 bytes)
4. Re: [Tigers] Tiger Rear Axle (score: 1): Author: "Bob Hokanson" <tgrrr@frontier.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 12:52:41 -0700; Speaking of DANA/SALISBURY, Rootes always alluded to an optional 3.77 rear gear but Dana seems to use 3.73. Is there an actual difference or is it 2 different names for the same thing? Bob H Rande, j; /html/tigers/2014-07/msg00015.html (11,148 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]