Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Tiger\s+hood\s+release\s+handle\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Tiger\s+hood\s+release\s+handle\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] Tiger hood release handle (score: 1): Author: snakebit289 <snakebit289@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 07:45:41 -0700; This might sound unrelated, but there was a discussion at least two years ago about the merits of the early and late design (early was the steel rod type and late was the cable. The rod type was used; /html/tigers/2014-10/msg00056.html (8,362 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] Tiger hood release handle (score: 1): Author: "Andy Walker" <awtiger@cox.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:12:45 -0500; Thanks for that bit of info, Rande. I've always wondered if my car should have the cable or not, but I'm glad to see that it should have the rod instead (B382001600). The rod is what's on there now b; /html/tigers/2014-10/msg00057.html (9,841 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] Tiger hood release handle (score: 1): Author: Stuart Brennan <sabre2tgr@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:00:19 -0400; And for anyone with a cable release, the conversion to a rod is a "bolt on", no drilling or other mods required. I converted my later Tiger (B382002452) to the rod type using a piece from an older Ti; /html/tigers/2014-10/msg00058.html (8,454 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]