- 1. Re: [TR] TR3 spare tire (score: 1)
- Author: fogbro1@comcast.net
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 00:01:09 +0000 (UTC)
- 4 speeds were a lot less common back in the 60s; also bigger and heavier. It might have been chosen for the smaller size; but I'd guess it's just what came out of the donor car. Ironically, though,
- /html/triumphs/2011-12/msg00207.html (7,442 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TR] TR3 spare tire (score: 1)
- Author: <wbeech@flash.net>
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 19:58:51 -0600
- The small block Chevy WAS heavier. The Ford used precision located cores, which allowed thinner and lighter castings. The Chevrolet used older, shift-prone sand cores, thus thicker walled castings. Y
- /html/triumphs/2011-12/msg00209.html (8,448 bytes)
- 3. [TR] TR3 spare tire (score: 1)
- Author: fogbro1 at comcast.net (fogbro1 at comcast.net)
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 00:01:09 +0000 (UTC)
- You mean to say there's a spare tire and that's where it goes??!!! Hmm, wonder how the spare tire comes out? -- Randall ** triumphs at autox.team.net ** Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archiv
- /html/triumphs/2011-12/msg00602.html (7,763 bytes)
- 4. [TR] TR3 spare tire (score: 1)
- Author: wbeech at flash.net (wbeech at flash.net)
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 19:58:51 -0600
- I think I like John's explanation and placement better, as a balance to the tailpipe below the rear apron. Although I think it would be hard to have the mounting stem go all the way to the boot floor
- /html/triumphs/2011-12/msg00604.html (9,370 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu