Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Shop\-talk\]\s+vacuum\s+cleaners\s+\(non\-shop\)\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. [Shop-talk] vacuum cleaners (non-shop) (score: 1)
Author: pethier@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:27:29 +0000 (UTC)
Anybody have a favorite upright domestic vacuum cleaner? My wife's Hoover has just tossed its brush belt, and she does not like it enough for me to fix it. She likes them light, but with an accessory
/html/shop-talk/2011-03/msg00140.html (8,121 bytes)

2. Re: [Shop-talk] vacuum cleaners (non-shop) (score: 1)
Author: Patton Dickson <57healey@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:08:30 -0500
My wife loves her Dyson. I am not sure it would be worth the money to you, but she used to complain about a string of different brands before. We were on a every 2 year replacement cycle as she was b
/html/shop-talk/2011-03/msg00141.html (8,401 bytes)

3. Re: [Shop-talk] vacuum cleaners (non-shop) (score: 1)
Author: <bjshov8@tx.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:19:08 -0400
We needed a new vacuum last year. (My wife was getting sick every time we vacuumed, so I decided to try a vacuum with HEPA filter.) I researched everything with a filter on BestBuy's website, and bou
/html/shop-talk/2011-03/msg00142.html (10,029 bytes)

4. Re: [Shop-talk] vacuum cleaners (non-shop) (score: 1)
Author: Tom & Marge FitzGibbon <fitzgibbon3@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 20:21:37 +0000 (UTC)
I second the Dyson (other than the whole not wanting to spend a fortune part). As Patton noted, they work wonders with pet hair. We have 2 dogs and were going through quality, brand-name vacuum clean
/html/shop-talk/2011-03/msg00143.html (9,579 bytes)

5. Re: [Shop-talk] vacuum cleaners (non-shop) (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Parkanzky" <parkanzky@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:30:26 -0400
Yet another vote for the Dyson. We've abused ours horribly for the past six years and we've been incredibly pleased with it. My wife couldn't vacuum before and now can because of the filters. And it
/html/shop-talk/2011-03/msg00144.html (9,648 bytes)

6. Re: [Shop-talk] vacuum cleaners (non-shop) (score: 1)
Author: Skip Albright <salbrigh@nycap.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:31:50 -0400
Dyson here too! First one we have had in 38 years of marriage that elicits a WOW. _______________________________________________ Shop-talk@autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Sugg
/html/shop-talk/2011-03/msg00145.html (7,546 bytes)

7. Re: [Shop-talk] vacuum cleaners (non-shop) (score: 1)
Author: pdqtr6@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 21:30:32 +0000 (UTC)
I can't stress this enough...B Avoid anything made by Kirby!!!B They are not light, reasonably priced, easy to use, inexpensive to maintain, or perfrom any better than an average cleaner (and worse t
/html/shop-talk/2011-03/msg00149.html (9,135 bytes)

8. Re: [Shop-talk] vacuum cleaners (non-shop) (score: 1)
Author: Battmain <battmain@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:52:13 -0700 (PDT)
Mine seems to be going strong too. Lemme see, '89 when mom bought it. Got too heavy for her to use. I inherited it. Other than belts, which last much longer if I remove the tension, the unit ran twic
/html/shop-talk/2011-03/msg00156.html (8,818 bytes)

9. Re: [Shop-talk] vacuum cleaners (non-shop) (score: 1)
Author: "David C." <cavanadd@frontier.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:01:43 -0700
We had a big, heavy, noisy Panasonic for about 15 years or so. It finally got to be too much of a PITA and after much research my wife got a Hoover "wind tunnel technology" vacuum. It also came with
/html/shop-talk/2011-03/msg00162.html (9,619 bytes)

10. Re: [Shop-talk] vacuum cleaners (non-shop) (score: 1)
Author: pethier@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 18:48:40 +0000 (UTC)
Thanks everybody for your input! We wound up getting a Bissel bagless "cyclonic" type. Interesting how the spoilers at the bottom of the chamber work. It has a foam pre-motor filter and a paper(?) po
/html/shop-talk/2011-04/msg00017.html (9,782 bytes)

11. Re: [Shop-talk] vacuum cleaners (non-shop) (score: 1)
Author: <bjshov8@tx.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 15:38:28 -0400
I used mine just this morning. Halfway through my house and it fills up the dust container. You do have to take the filters out and clean them occasionally too, probably more frequently than the mont
/html/shop-talk/2011-04/msg00018.html (6,759 bytes)

12. [Shop-talk] vacuum cleaners (non-shop) (score: 1)
Author: pethier at comcast.net (pethier at comcast.net)
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:27:29 +0000 (UTC)
Anybody have a favorite upright domestic vacuum cleaner? My wife's Hoover has just tossed its brush belt, and she does not like it enough for me to fix it. She likes them light, but with an accessory
/html/shop-talk/2011-03/msg00322.html (8,855 bytes)

13. [Shop-talk] vacuum cleaners (non-shop) (score: 1)
Author: 57healey at gmail.com (Patton Dickson)
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:08:30 -0500
My wife loves her Dyson. I am not sure it would be worth the money to you, but she used to complain about a string of different brands before. We were on a every 2 year replacement cycle as she was b
/html/shop-talk/2011-03/msg00323.html (9,487 bytes)

14. [Shop-talk] vacuum cleaners (non-shop) (score: 1)
Author: bjshov8 at tx.rr.com (bjshov8 at tx.rr.com)
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:19:08 -0400
We needed a new vacuum last year. (My wife was getting sick every time we vacuumed, so I decided to try a vacuum with HEPA filter.) I researched everything with a filter on BestBuy's website, and bou
/html/shop-talk/2011-03/msg00324.html (11,228 bytes)

15. [Shop-talk] vacuum cleaners (non-shop) (score: 1)
Author: fitzgibbon3 at comcast.net (Tom & Marge FitzGibbon)
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 20:21:37 +0000 (UTC)
I second the Dyson (other than the whole not wanting to spend a fortune part). As Patton noted, they work wonders with pet hair. We have 2 dogs and were going through quality, brand-name vacuum clean
/html/shop-talk/2011-03/msg00325.html (10,849 bytes)

16. [Shop-talk] vacuum cleaners (non-shop) (score: 1)
Author: parkanzky at gmail.com (Paul Parkanzky)
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:30:26 -0400
Yet another vote for the Dyson. We've abused ours horribly for the past six years and we've been incredibly pleased with it. My wife couldn't vacuum before and now can because of the filters. And it
/html/shop-talk/2011-03/msg00326.html (11,242 bytes)

17. [Shop-talk] vacuum cleaners (non-shop) (score: 1)
Author: pdqtr6 at comcast.net (pdqtr6 at comcast.net)
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 21:30:32 +0000 (UTC)
I can't stress this enough...B Avoid anything made by Kirby!!!B They are not light, reasonably priced, easy to use, inexpensive to maintain, or perfrom any better than an average cleaner (and worse t
/html/shop-talk/2011-03/msg00331.html (10,319 bytes)

18. [Shop-talk] vacuum cleaners (non-shop) (score: 1)
Author: battmain at yahoo.com (Battmain)
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:52:13 -0700 (PDT)
Mine seems to be going strong too. Lemme see, '89 when mom bought it. Got too heavy for her to use. I inherited it. Other than belts, which last much longer if I remove the tension, the unit ran twic
/html/shop-talk/2011-03/msg00338.html (9,622 bytes)

19. [Shop-talk] vacuum cleaners (non-shop) (score: 1)
Author: cavanadd at frontier.com (David C.)
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:01:43 -0700
We had a big, heavy, noisy Panasonic for about 15 years or so. It finally got to be too much of a PITA and after much research my wife got a Hoover "wind tunnel technology" vacuum. It also came with
/html/shop-talk/2011-03/msg00344.html (10,343 bytes)

20. [Shop-talk] vacuum cleaners (non-shop) (score: 1)
Author: pethier at comcast.net (pethier at comcast.net)
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 18:48:40 +0000 (UTC)
Thanks everybody for your input! We wound up getting a Bissel bagless "cyclonic" type. Interesting how the spoilers at the bottom of the chamber work. It has a foam pre-motor filter and a paper(?) po
/html/shop-talk/2011-04/msg00230.html (10,120 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu