Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Shop\-talk\]\s+camry\s+hybrids\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Shop\-talk\]\s+camry\s+hybrids\s*$/: 51 ]

Total 51 documents matching your query.

1. [Shop-talk] camry hybrids (score: 1): Author: Tim <tputland@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 20:43:34 -0500 (EST); Looking for people's feedback, input, experiences, etc on camry hybrids. I know literally nothing about hybirds and always like the info, etc I read here. My wife read 150K mileage battery life. Does; /html/shop-talk/2013-01/msg00082.html (8,780 bytes)
2. Re: [Shop-talk] camry hybrids (score: 1): Author: Tim <tputland@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 21:13:42 -0500 (EST); OH yea, we are looking at an 07 with 143K on it. We can't afford a lower mileage car but have no choice--we have to buy something. The wife totaled her car Saturday and we have to have two cars. ____; /html/shop-talk/2013-01/msg00083.html (9,960 bytes)
3. Re: [Shop-talk] camry hybrids (score: 1): Author: "Eric J Russell" <ejrussell@mebtel.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 21:33:08 -0500 a=P2oOn6vrs4wA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=S2wpYzp2RsyRkoRNwqcm1Q==:17 a=9hz1sfIYevUganGKg38A:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=S2wpYzp2RsyRkoRNwqcm1Q==:117 reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fg; I don't see the 'bottom line' advantage of the hybrids. The added cost is not usually offset by any fuel savings until gas gets over $5.00/gallon. Our 2006 Camry Solara with 4 cylinder engine easily; /html/shop-talk/2013-01/msg00084.html (9,658 bytes)
4. Re: [Shop-talk] camry hybrids (score: 1): Author: Ronnie Day <ronnie.day@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 20:57:02 -0600; Think about borrowing or renting something for a couple of weeks so you have more time to look and decide. _______________________________________________ Shop-talk@autox.team.net Archive: http://www; /html/shop-talk/2013-01/msg00085.html (11,891 bytes)
5. Re: [Shop-talk] camry hybrids (score: 1): Author: Shannah Miller <shannahquilts@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 21:52:14 -0800; I hope your wife is okay. I can't speak to whether or not you should buy the Camry. However, we have an 2005 Prius with about 98,000 miles on it, and we aren't anywhere near buying new batteries. Our; /html/shop-talk/2013-01/msg00086.html (13,137 bytes)
6. Re: [Shop-talk] camry hybrids (score: 1): Author: Scott <scott.hall.personal@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 08:16:41 -0800; I love hybrids--both the concept and Toyota's execution of them. Having said that...I second the advice about looking at non-hybrids. Several co-workers have various hybrids and I suspect the adverti; /html/shop-talk/2013-01/msg00087.html (11,449 bytes)
7. Re: [Shop-talk] camry hybrids (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <TR3driver@ca.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 06:52:57 -0800; A good friend of mine has owned several Priuses (or whatever the plural is). He claimed to routinely get over 50 mpg on his commute to work (in LA traffic but in the carpool lane), while his "leadfo; /html/shop-talk/2013-01/msg00088.html (10,782 bytes)
8. Re: [Shop-talk] camry hybrids (score: 1): Author: John Miller <jem@milleredp.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 07:07:36 -0800; The concept's okay if you don't mind the extra complexity and package size. But...I've found late-model Toyota product to be pretty unpleasant vehicles to drive. There's something about the last coup; /html/shop-talk/2013-01/msg00089.html (11,526 bytes)
9. Re: [Shop-talk] camry hybrids (score: 1): Author: Michael Porter <mdporter@dfn.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 08:31:22 -0700; Apples and oranges. Your M5 is a car with an MRSP of over $80K. Do you really expect a car for half or less than that price--and with technology radically different than yours--to be better overall?; /html/shop-talk/2013-01/msg00090.html (11,090 bytes)
10. Re: [Shop-talk] camry hybrids (score: 1): Author: John Miller <jem@milleredp.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 08:11:53 -0800; 70k E39, and that has nothing to do with it. I just dragged home a freebie '86 Celica beater that has better seats, better material quality, and better outward visibility than any present Toyota. Jo; /html/shop-talk/2013-01/msg00091.html (10,412 bytes)
11. Re: [Shop-talk] camry hybrids (score: 1): Author: Michael Porter <mdporter@dfn.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:25:36 -0700; Oh, yes, it does, because that's your standard for comparison (what year?-a 2007 is $82K). $70K is still about double the cost of the cars to which you're making a judgment. And, your `86 Celica gets; /html/shop-talk/2013-01/msg00092.html (11,488 bytes)
12. Re: [Shop-talk] camry hybrids (score: 1): Author: Paul Parkanzky <parkanzky@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 11:30:54 -0500; I have to agree that the modern Toyotas have pretty terrible seats and are incredibly numb to drive. And that's comparing it to our '09 TDI Jetta and '10 TDI Golf. For the record, I don't like the se; /html/shop-talk/2013-01/msg00093.html (12,048 bytes)
13. Re: [Shop-talk] camry hybrids (score: 1): Author: Mike Rambour <lists@dinospider.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 08:47:39 -0800; Hybrids are nice, a friend owns a Prius and while there was nothing wrong his 3 year old one, he traded it in on a new one a month ago. He wanted the "cooler" that tries to keep the interior cool whi; /html/shop-talk/2013-01/msg00094.html (12,269 bytes)
14. Re: [Shop-talk] camry hybrids (score: 1): Author: Shannah Miller <shannahquilts@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 08:54:09 -0800; Let me state upfront that I do like my 2010 Prius. That said, "numb" is a great way to describe it. It's my understanding that the brakes are computer controlled. This leads to zero road feel in the; /html/shop-talk/2013-01/msg00095.html (14,688 bytes)
15. Re: [Shop-talk] camry hybrids (score: 1): Author: John Miller <jem@milleredp.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 08:56:00 -0800; I said that '86 Celica had: a) better seats b) better material quality c) better outward visibility than any present Toyota. Do you dispute those points? Please explain where I said anything about t; /html/shop-talk/2013-01/msg00096.html (12,314 bytes)
16. Re: [Shop-talk] camry hybrids (score: 1): Author: Bob Spidell <bspidell@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 17:08:39 +0000 (UTC); +1 -- Bob Spidell - San Jose, CA Hybrids are nice, a friend owns a Prius and while there was nothing wrong his 3 year old one, he traded it in on a new one a month ago. He wanted the "cooler" that tr; /html/shop-talk/2013-01/msg00097.html (12,539 bytes)
17. Re: [Shop-talk] camry hybrids (score: 1): Author: Miq Millman <miq@bigllama.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:10:54 -0800; There are multiple studies available that compare Diesel to Hybrid and for the cost per mile, plus long term recycling (li-ion battery == land fill waste == not green) the Diesel is better, even payi; /html/shop-talk/2013-01/msg00098.html (13,727 bytes)
18. Re: [Shop-talk] camry hybrids (score: 1): Author: John Miller <jem@milleredp.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:19:04 -0800; There's apparently a large buyer base out there who cares about nothing but fuel economy and iPhone integration. Really, though, the Prius these days goes pretty well (especially if you push the 'Po; /html/shop-talk/2013-01/msg00099.html (11,405 bytes)
19. Re: [Shop-talk] camry hybrids (score: 1): Author: Michael Porter <mdporter@dfn.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:22:33 -0700; And, it got much shittier mileage, and, maybe, the newer cars don't because of changes to the overall configuration, including seats and the shape of the envelope. You didn't. Which means you ignored; /html/shop-talk/2013-01/msg00100.html (14,720 bytes)
20. Re: [Shop-talk] camry hybrids (score: 1): Author: John Miller <jem@milleredp.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:41:28 -0800; Let's see here. Since 1981 I've driven two or more examples of virtually every Toyota product built. Corollas, Celicas, a few Camrys, Mk2/3 Supras and a Mk4. Land Cruisers, 4Runners, the occasional; /html/shop-talk/2013-01/msg00101.html (13,273 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]